the escaped unicorn
by
Douglas Messerli
Karen
Finley The Expanded Unicorn Gratitude
Mystery / Los Angeles, Redcat (Roy and Edna Disney/Cal Arts Theater) / I
attended a performance on opening night, October 12, 2017, with
Deborah Meadows
At
61 years of age, performance artist Karen Finley has moved away from her
earlier provocative sexual performances to present, in The Expanded Unicorn Gratitude Mystery, a series of often sharply satirical monologues centered around the
mythologies of national figures, mostly women or wanna-be-women.
The beautiful small beast (at least in
medieval tapestries) with a phallic-like protrusion sprouting from its head, is
represented, although rather sketchily, as a kind of graceful, if a bit
frightening, male/female animal, often locked away in fenced-off areas from which,
as the beginning film narrative suggests, it could nonetheless have easily
escaped.
Some of these riffs work better than
others. The early, supposedly stylishly dressed woman of “gratitude,” reminding
us of Jackie Kennedy, is smarmy enough that you quickly wish her into the “corn
field” from where she seems to have come, as she spouts, over and over again,
“I thank you, I want to thank you, I am so pleased and filled with gratitude,
etc. etc”—resulting in a never-ending series of platitudes the likes of which
one sees only in the Academy Awards ceremonies (Sally Fields also comes to
mind). Surely she is totally appreciative of the unicorn’s charming abilities,
without questioning its possibility to escape and “thrust.”
Perhaps a bit less successful was
Finley’s testimony to the little blue dress, worn by Monica Lewinsky, stained into
eternity by Bill Clinton’s semen. The trouble is that, despite, the clever
props of an entire clothesline of blue dresses, a blue-filigree roof floated
over most of the audience, and which took audience participation to create, and
even the endless extrusion of sperm across the performer’s blue garment,
Lewinsky is just not that interesting as a character of satiric intent. The
dress became a replacement for the woman at its heart.
Finley’s monologue about Hillary Clinton
is far sharper and, when it succeeds, is closer to the bone. Her Clinton
realizes she is a figure beloved to be hated, and nervously adjusts her
dialogues to deal with the two-edged sword with which she will constantly be
met. If there was any true personification of the unicorn, a woman in a pair of
male pants, it is her vision of Clinton, a woman trying to ameliorate the duo
position of a strong woman in our society. And her often self-destructive
attempts to position herself in our sexist world are both loveable and despicable
at the very same moment. One cringes while trying to hold back the tears.
Certainly the most popular of Finley’s
caricatures in this work was her performance of the hermaphroditic Trump, who
loves cunts so much that he wants to himself become a “pussy.” Playing on the
dozens of cartoons portraying the President in drag with figures such a Putin,
along with Trump’s odd coiffeur, his endless applications of orange makeup, and
his always oval-shaped lips, the performer makes it clear that Trump is perhaps
the most like the mythological unicorn, a fleecy little girl with a big boy
cock sprouting from his forehead. Here Finley often is at her very best; but
the determination by some of the audience members to cheer on her every line
with dramatic he-haws and hoots only showed-up those instances when the satire
had completely gone over the top, falling into the category of simple mockery.
I can forgive the mockery, particularly by
an artist who has herself been mocked by her own governmental officials as she
was in 1990 when the then-head of the National Endowment for the Arts, John
Frohnmayer vetoed her and 3 other performance artist’s grants for indecent
behavior; but it’s hard to forgive what appears to be her claque. Finley
herself seemed to diffuse the situation a bit by observing the somewhat
scattered Redcat theater attendance the way only Trump might: “This is the
biggest audience ever!”
Perhaps Finley’s most complex and profound
monologue was the last, about a woman who so loved war that she could only have
sexual relationships with soldiers, particularly those who had lost their
limbs. In Finley’s round-about-telling, it becomes apparent that the woman
comes to see her power by being fucked with the missing “stumps” of the
generations of sons and sons and sons who are bred simply to go to war. As a
female, she is the true progenitor of an army of American boys raised up only
to lose their limbs and minds in the destruction of others. Dressed in a kind
of American flag, Finley almost exhausts herself through this role until she
bows, at end, for applause.
Los Angeles,
October 13, 2017
No comments:
Post a Comment