wasted on youth
by Douglas Messerli
Rick
Elice (based on a fiction by Dave Barry and Ridley Pearson) Peter and the Starcatcher / New York
City,
On May 6, 2011 I attended Mabou Mine’s Peter and Wendy at New York City’s
Victory Theatre, a delightful rendition of Barrie’s Peter Pan story performed
by actors and puppets. Quite by accident—although I now believe such
“accidents” are “intentional coincidences”—almost one year to the date I
attended, last evening, Rick Elice’s amazingly theatrical prequel to Barrie’s
tale, Peter and the Starcatcher.
Although I’m reluctant to compare it with the far less entertaining Wicked’s relationship to The Wizard of Oz, it stands in a similar
position to the original.
This
is a work, moreover, so different from most of Broadway’s current theater
offerings in that it thoroughly depends on its ensemble cast, as the actors
transform themselves from sailors into pirates, mermen, and a strange band of
Mollusk Island natives whose leader has suffered indignities as a servant in
the home of a wealthy English family.
All
of this play’s figures perform delightfully, as one by one they get their
individual turns to strut their stuff; but the clear “star” of this zany
concoction is the dyslexic, spoonerism-spouting, “nancy-boy” pirate, Black
Stache (Christian Borle)—an earlier manifestation of Peter Pan’s crocodile hating, Captain Hook—who discovers in the
“boy” (who later changes his name to Peter and finally is awarded his last
name, Pan) his perfect nemesis, a kind of kindred yin to his yearning yang.
Even more delicious, when Stache prances forward to put his tongue upon the
plank, is Smee (Kevin Del Aguila), close behind, to correct those
incomprehensible twists of tortured syntax.
Almost as enticing is the crowd-pleasing frivolity of Molly’s sexually
assertive nanny, Mrs. Brumbrake (Arnie Burton) and Fighting Prawn (Teddy
Bergmann) who cling to one another, pushing and prodding from every possible
position.
In
contrast to these figures’ shenanigans, Molly and the orphan boys, Peter, Alf,
and the ever-starving Ted are not nearly so much fun—although they might be
forgiven when we consider that by comparison with their orphan torments,
Dickens’ Oliver Twist might be said to have lived a life of luxury. They are,
moreover, doomed to live in eternal adolescence as outsiders, perpetual kidnappers
of generations of temporary girl-moms. No wonder Peter, as he often announces,
hates adults. Might he not simply be taken home to be petted and loved?
Evidently not, particularly after he has bathed in the star-leaden
waters that offer him whatever he might desire to become. And although he never
really flies in this production he does occasionally soar with the rest of his
friends. Fortunately, or unfortunately, depending on your point of view, he
remains an innocent, who like most innocents and far too many children are
capable, competent, and serious-minded, while the adults around them all
ridiculously blunder through their lives. One can only mutter at the end of
this splendiferous caprice: “What a waste of youth!”
As I
stood to leave the young girl in front turned to announce, as if to confirm her
own seriousness of intent: “I read the book”; while her equally sure-footed
brother asserted: “I liked it, did you?”
No comments:
Post a Comment