making swan
lake dangerous
by
Douglas Messerli
Pyotr
Ilyich Tchaikovsky (composer), Matthew Bourne director and choreographer Matthew
Bourne’s Swan Lake / 2019 (the review below was written after I saw a production in Los Angeles at the Ahmanson Theatre on December 10, 2019, after which I watched the film version).
In
1995 English dancer and choreographer Matthew Bourne did something quite audacious
in the world of ballet by taking the often-stuffy tutu-laden Tchaikovsky ballet
Swan Lake into a world of a fantasy about the psychological turmoil of
coming to terms with one’s gay sexuality. He was grandly helped by the set and
costume design of Lez Brotherston.
While keeping much of the basic story of
the original, particularly the romantic tale of a young Prince falling in love
with a swan, by transforming the basic tale into a modern-day story of royalty not
so very different from the Court of Queen Elizabeth, he presented the myth
through a very different lens. Except for the fact that this young Prince, having
daily to face the cold and distant attentions of the Queen (elegantly and often
humorously performed by Nicole Kabera in the production I saw and in the film), is clearly
not the obviously heterosexual Prince Charles, but you might well understand why
Australian choreographer Graeme Murphy was tempted to embrace this ballet into
the context of Charles’ marriage to Princess Diana.
The
young prince of Bourne’s production simply wants love and seeks it out first
with a vivacious woman intruder (Katrina Lyndon), titled in the program simply
as “The Girlfriend.” This gauche young woman, clearly hated by the Queen, is
certainly no friend and is less a young girl than an outright tart. The Queen,
obviously, wants her son to marry someone of his own class, made clear in the
attendees of “The Royal Ball” in Act Three. Actually, she is planted into the
royal castle by the Queen’s “Private Secretary” (Jack Jones), who hopes to
bring down the monarchy and put himself as the Head of State.
The Prince (Andrew Monaghan / Liam Mower in the film) clumsily attempts to dance with the intruder while attending a very funny ballet performance,
which
wittily imitates earlier productions of this same ballet, with his mother, secretary
von Rothbart, and his sudden “girlfriend,”
He even attempts to track her down in a
sleazy bar, The Swank, where lusty men and women dance quite licentiously—clearly
a world to which the innocent young man is not accustomed. When he finds that
even the new girlfriend is completely disinterested in him, he mopes alone at a
separate table and is eventually tossed out into the streets by the sailors who
inhabit the disco.
Despondent, he wanders off to a nearby
park wherein, on a lake, several swans swim. Bourne has already shown us that
the Prince has had nightmares about the swans, and now we witness a sign posted
nearby warning visitors not to feed the swans. We can only recognize that the
food on which the swans might feed are not bags of fish-chips, but the bodies of
male human beings—precisely, after posting a note about his suicide, the Prince
feeds them himself as he quickly becomes enthralled with the virile naked torsos
and feather covered leggings of Bourne’s leaping and flying dancers.

The outstretched inviting hands, always imitating
the neck gestures of swans, are accepted and rejected, while the common male-female
lifts of the Prince into the Swans arms represent the former’s transformation
into a world of sexual bliss that as strange almost as what Edward Albee
describes in his odd 2002 play The Goat, or Who Is Sylvia?
After all, this is not the first time that
animals have transformed themselves into animals in order to seduce the human
race: one need only to remind ourselves of Zeus’ transformation into a swan in
order to impregnate Leda.
In part, Bourne’s ballet gives the
heterosexual world a vision of what it means to “come out,” as the beautiful
Prince, now transformed by the male version of the traditional version’s Odette,
becomes obsessed with his new lover. Is it at all surprising that he sees the
face of the Swan in another intruder into the court, the Royal Ball the Queen has
commanded to present numerous international beauties from which her son will
have to choose for a proper wife?
These supposed “beauties,” particularly
once the sexual “Stranger” (as in the original wherein Odette appeared as Odile)
enters—seemingly a human version of the Prince’s swan-lover—become equally
enchanted the man, entering into tarantellas and tango-like entanglements with
the man, whom the Prince now shockingly perceives as a kind of reversal of
behavior, a “black” swan-like being (dressed in a black waist coat and black
leather pants), if nothing else a darker, far more aggressive vision of his
gentler new-found lover.
As in so many such family situations, the
sexually “confused” young son is incarcerated in an asylum, looked after by an
army of a doctor and nurses, all of whom, as in the first scene, appear to be
various apparitions of his dominating mother. Bourne almost seems to be hinting
here of gay conversion therapy, which often makes the patient go mad.
Laid into his overlarge bed by his nurses,
the demons of his sexual desires are let loose, the swans coming out, as in a
horrified child’s dream, from under the bed itself, even from within the mattress
to haunt him. Although the lead swan reappears in an attempt to calm the
sufferer, the swan corps turn on both of them, terrifying the Prince.
Bourne has brought us, as I read it, into
a kind of mad gay bar wherein everyone wants a piece of action with the cutest
man in the room, which Monaghan clearly is. There are subtle hints here even of
The Red Shoes (a ballet in which Monaghan has performed), as the Prince,
once he has accepted his longings, cannot escape the consequences of his own
open sexuality, dancing himself impossibly into death.
What we realize in Bourne’s brilliant re-creation
of this balletic chestnut is how fresh it can still be and how marvelously
accurate it is its conception. Swan Lake, with its infusions of myth and
fairy-tale, must have seemed almost dangerous upon its original production—although
it was, at first, not particularly popular, and only later came to be seen as a
major work of art. But Bourne in 1995 Bourne re-energized it, made it come
alive as a dangerous work again. And in the wonderful production which I
visited last night, subtitled “The Legend Returns,” we are truly brought back
into that magical world where humans copulate with swans, and swans are freed
to become almost human, and queer humans at that.
Los
Angeles, December 11, 2019
Reprinted
from USTheater, Opera, and Performance (December 2019).